We're Accepting 3 New Clients This Month — Your First Personal Training Session Is Complimentary

Walking vs Running for Weight Loss: Which Wins for People Over 40?

Running burns more per hour, but over 40 the winner is whatever you'll still be doing a year from now. A trainer explains walking vs running and the option most people miss.

·11 min read
Clear creek winding over granite boulders through a sunlit pine forest, the kind of walk that counts as exercise when you are losing weight over 40

Most of us spend our days prioritizing everyone else and pushing our own well-being to the back burner. So when we finally set a goal for ourselves, we want the easiest, most efficient route to the finish line.

The Treadmill in the Basement

You look at the treadmill turned clothes hanger sitting in the basement and think, "I could start walking. I did buy that thing three years ago... wonder if I ever set it up."

So three days later, you've walked a grand total of 19 minutes and 38 seconds. And you think, "Well, I haven't lost any weight yet. What if I try running? That's just fast walking. Gotta be better!"

Your thought would be correct. Sort of.

What the Research Says: Running Wins on Paper

A 2013 paper in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise followed 15,237 walkers and 32,216 runners for just over six years. It compared how much weight people lost for the same amount of energy spent walking or running.

In short, they found running is more efficient and more effective for weight loss. Shocker.

The gap was biggest in the heaviest people in the study: for the same energy spent, running produced 90 percent more weight loss than walking.

90%

more weight loss from running than walking for the same energy spent, in the heaviest group of 47,000+ walkers and runners

Source: Williams, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2013

So case closed, right? Go dust off the running shoes?

Not so fast. Before you do, I have a few questions for you.

The Catch: How Do Your Knees Feel?

Let me ask you something.

How do your knees feel on a daily basis? How about your hips, or your back? When is the last time you actually ran?

These questions matter, because going from not exercising for 15 years straight into running has the potential to be a bad decision. Especially if you already have aches and pains.

Running is hard. Running in a meaningful enough way to lose weight is really hard. Every stride lands your body weight on your ankles, knees, and hips, over and over. Now, I'm all for doing hard things. But I am not for doing things that might hurt you, especially exercise. It's supposed to make us feel good.

To be clear, running isn't the villain here. A 2017 meta-analysis in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy looked at more than 114,000 people and found hip and knee arthritis in just 3.5 percent of recreational runners, compared with 10.2 percent of people who didn't exercise at all.

3.5% vs 10.2%

hip and knee arthritis rates in recreational runners vs sedentary non-runners

Source: Alentorn-Geli et al., Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2017

So running isn't what wrecks knees. Sitting still is no gift to your joints either. The problem is the jump: going from the couch to three miles with knees, hips, and a back that haven't been asked to do anything in years. That's how week two ends with an ice pack and a cancelled plan.

If your back or hips are already cranky from a desk job, start with how to fix tight hips from sitting and lower back pain from sitting all day before you worry about running.

The Question That Actually Matters: What Will You Do Consistently?

Here's the next important thing to think about: what are you going to do consistently?

It does not matter if you run three times and then quit because your body hurts. What matters is the 108th run. Or the 267th walk.

This word, consistency, keeps coming up in our weekly discussions, and I really want you to feel how important it is. We just have to do something, multiple times per week, for it to make a difference.

And here's the part of that 2013 study that usually gets left out. Over the six years, the runners cut back on their running much more than the walkers cut back on their walking. Running gave more weight loss per hour, but people did fewer hours of it as time went on.

That's the whole argument in one finding. The "better" exercise is the one you're still doing next year.

Walking vs Running at a Glance

WalkingRunning
Weight loss per hourLowerHigher
Stress on knees, hips and backLowHigh
Can you start today after years off?YesRisky
Easy to do most days of the week?YesHarder, needs recovery days
Sticking with it for yearsEasierPeople tend to cut back
Best forStarting out, achy joints, daily activityPeople already active and pain-free

The Real Kicker: Strength Training

Now, I know I'm comparing running vs walking. But if you had to guess the best way to lose weight, especially over 40, what would you guess?

Strength training. Damn, you're smart.

Let me be honest about what I mean, because this is where a lot of people get confused. Lifting on its own isn't a fast way to make the scale drop. A 2022 meta-analysis in Sports Medicine of 54 studies found that resistance training, without any diet changes, lowered body fat by about 1.5 percentage points. Real, but modest.

Where strength training wins is in what you lose.

When you lose weight, some of it comes from fat and some comes from muscle. After 40, you're already losing muscle every year, and you do not want to speed that up. A 2010 review in Nutrition Reviews of adults over 50 found that 81 percent of diet-only groups lost at least 15 percent of their weight as lean mass, compared with 39 percent of groups that also exercised.

And a 2017 trial in the New England Journal of Medicine put this to the test directly. Dieting adults over 65 did either cardio, strength training, or both. All three groups lost about 9 percent of their body weight. But:

  • The cardio-only group lost 5 percent of their lean mass.
  • The strength training group lost just 2 percent.
  • The combined group, lifting plus cardio, improved their physical function the most.

5% vs 2%

lean mass lost by dieting older adults doing cardio only vs strength training, for the same 9% weight loss

Source: Villareal et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 2017

Same weight on the scale. Very different bodies. One group got lighter and weaker. The other got lighter and kept their strength.

That's why I say strength training is the best way to lose weight. Not because it melts pounds the fastest, but because it makes sure the weight you lose is the weight you want to lose. I went deeper on protecting muscle in how to build muscle after 50 and strength training on a GLP-1.

A Simple Plan If You're Over 40

If you want to lose weight and you haven't exercised in a while, here's where I'd start:

  1. Strength train two to three times a week. Full-body, with someone teaching you the movements. This protects your muscle, strengthens the joints you'd need for running anyway, and makes everything else easier.
  2. Walk most days. Start with what you can actually do, even if that's 10 minutes. Add a few minutes each week. Yes, the basement treadmill counts, once you move the laundry.
  3. Keep it boring and repeatable. You're aiming for the 108th workout, not a heroic first week.
  4. Want to run? Earn it. Once you're walking comfortably and you're stronger, add short running intervals. Your knees will thank you for the patience.

If it's been years since you've done any of this, how to start working out again after 40 walks through what the first few months should look like.

Want to lose weight, but your knees hurt when you run? Come try us out for a week at our Allison Park studio. We'll build a strength plan around the joints you've got.

EXPLORE PERSONAL TRAINING

The Bottom Line

Running beats walking for weight loss, on paper. But paper doesn't have your knees.

If you're over 40, the winner is whatever you'll still be doing a year from now. For most people, that's walking, paired with strength training two to three times a week. That combination loses fat, keeps muscle, and doesn't leave you limping.

If you're in Allison Park, the North Hills, or anywhere around Pittsburgh and you want to lose weight without wrecking your knees, fill out the form on our website and come try us out for a week. See what you think.

Always remember: the more willing you are to make changes to prioritize your well-being, the better you will be at taking care of those around you. YOUR well-being is important, and it is time to start prioritizing it, FOR LIFE.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is walking or running better for weight loss?

Hour for hour, running. A 2013 study that followed 15,237 walkers and 32,216 runners for 6.2 years found running produced greater weight loss than walking for the same energy spent, up to 90 percent more in the heaviest participants. But the same study found runners cut back on their running more over those six years than walkers cut back on walking. The better exercise for weight loss is the one you are still doing a year from now.

Is walking or running better for weight loss over 40?

For most people over 40 who have not exercised in years, walking is the better place to start. Going from nothing to running is hard on joints that already ache, and an injury in week two ends the plan. Walking is easy to repeat several times a week, and once you are consistent and stronger, you can add running later if you want to.

Is running bad for your knees?

Not by itself. A 2017 meta-analysis of more than 114,000 people found hip and knee arthritis in 3.5 percent of recreational runners, compared with 10.2 percent of sedentary non-runners and 13.3 percent of competitive runners. The risk is jumping into running after years of inactivity, especially with existing knee, hip, or back pain. Build strength first, then build running slowly.

Can you lose weight just by walking?

Yes, if you walk consistently and your eating supports it. Walking burns fewer calories per minute than running, but it is much easier to do most days of the week for years. For people over 40, pairing walking with strength training two to three times a week helps make sure the weight you lose is fat rather than muscle.

Is strength training better than cardio for weight loss?

On the scale alone, lifting is not a fast mover. A 2022 meta-analysis found resistance training without dieting lowered body fat percentage by about 1.5 points. Its real value is protecting muscle while you lose weight. In a 2017 trial of dieting adults over 65, the aerobic-only group lost 5 percent of their lean mass, while the resistance and combined groups lost only 2 to 3 percent. The combined group improved physical function the most.

What is the best exercise for weight loss over 40?

A combination: strength training two to three times a week, walking most days, and eating that supports your goal. Strength training protects the muscle you have, which matters more every year after 40. Walking adds daily activity without beating up your joints. And both are easy enough to do consistently, which is what actually produces results.

Ready to train smarter?

Want to lose weight without wrecking your knees? Come try us out for a week at Full Circle Function & Fitness in Allison Park, and we'll build a strength plan that fits your body.

FREE PERSONAL TRAINING SESSION
Cody Bock

About the author

Cody Bock

Owner, Personal Trainer & Licensed Massage Therapist

M.S. Exercise Science · LMT (Licensed Massage Therapist)

Cody Bock is the founder of Full Circle Function & Fitness in Allison Park, PA. He combines a master's in exercise science with hands-on massage therapy expertise to help Pittsburgh's North Hills clients move better, train smarter, and recover faster.

Meet the team

Related Reading